Cuasso TO MONTE "You want my place? Take my handicap. " States that the slogan of a popular campaign launched against the illegal occupation and outlawed the stands reserved for the disabled. Too bad that things did not work in Varese, just like in this folder. Because, as demonstrated by two judgments of the magistrate's Anna Sfardini, even if you are caught parked in spaces reserved for the handicapped can, quite easily, get away with it, seeing curtailed or even canceled the penalty. They know something the mayor of Cuasso al Monte, Francesco Ziliani and local police agents of the consortium of valley literally went on a rampage after two similar rulings issued 26 June 2006 and 28 October 2008. Acts that have been delivered in recent days and showing that all the gravity of the situation. The facts tell of two fines issued by local police of Valceresio against two motorists to the Mount Cuasso had left their cars parked right in the space reserved for the handicapped. So it is taken on time the penalty for violating Article 155 / 5 of the Code of the road undoubtedly reads as "the standing or parking shall be prohibited in areas reserved to the bus stop or parking of vehicles for disabled persons." Just when, for once, seemed too smart to have been nailed to their responsibilities came the twist. With the two actions were examined and accepted in full in one case and partially in the other. The result of the two violations, one was canceled, the other, be reduced in value to the normal generic no parking. With that motivation, in the words of the mayor of Cuasso, Francesco Ziliani, "have the paradoxical and leave without parole." "The action - writes in the justice of the peace sentence that totally cancels one of two penalties - is well founded and worth acceptance because it was felt to reserve spaces for vehicles of disabled persons so that they could find a parking space without having to laborious research. But when in certain situations, for example in the evening, there is plenty of empty parking lots in the area, as stated by officials, the reserve space is not necessary. " Appeal upheld a moral and a penalty aside, the other partially successful with the penalty reduced. All with the very same reasons. And a potentially devastating message: You can park in disabled spaces in the evening and if there are other parking available. So if you were to get a disabled person could always make do.
22"; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-alt:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:auto; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 2.0cm 2.0cm 2.0cm; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->
JUDGMENTS Aberrant
"Two aberrant judgments that leave truly speechless." Do not use half measures, the lawyer Fabio Bottinelli, legal advisor greed of Varese, the Association of Voluntary Service handicapped and disabled to comment the acceptance, partial in one case and other total, the two appeals for penalties imposed to punish the illegal parking in spaces reserved for disabled people. Lawyer
how we define these judgments? I believe there is only one adjective and needs to be repeated to understand the gravity of this decision and it is abhorrent.
has no doubts on the contestability of these words pronounced? None. Why are parking spaces reserved for disabled people not only have the purpose to facilitate the staging, as it also acknowledges the justice of the peace, but they have other, far more profound, and worth the time. Must allow the disabled to make the most of urban areas. For this are broader than others, closer to other facilities, most convenient to reach
.
And how does the implicit justification that the court gives on other normal free parking in the area? This should be rather aggravating. If there are free parking spaces and one deliberately chooses to employ the disabled access can not be used as a mitigating factor. Also to punish an attitude that just having the availability of other parking spaces has all the characteristics of anti-social.
is the second of two rulings that the penalty for changing the classification no parking as easy as judges? if this is legally possible even worse. Why or parking is allowed or not for a specific reason. And if it's not like in this case, the penalty must state the reasons for which it was imposed.
How bad do these judgments for the disabled and those who seek to protect their rights? lot. Why did they cancel any of the awareness-raising activities we pursue. Here we are in the field of insanity. Why are the crazy justifications used to cancel the sanctions.
There is at least one positive note in this story? course. The attitude of the local police of Valceresio. People who have done their full duty. For this to them and authorities say that personally I am not going to drop this matter.
0 comments:
Post a Comment